A farmer griping about the weather is a cliché for sure. I try not to dwell too much on the weather on this blog, but today I can't help myself.
Without a doubt, this year's cycle of winter giving birth to spring has been a drawn-out and difficult labor. But last week, the Pioneer Valley got its natural disaster bona-fides after tornadoes ripped through Hampden County.
And after reading the article on the front page of today’s New York Times about how global warming is affecting agriculture, yes, I feel compelled to offer a few thoughts on the weather.
My own thoughts, assumptions, and observations about global warming were eerily mirrored in the article. I often quip that New England farmers may be among the few beneficiaries of global warming. Our growing season is short, our winters are long. What could be bad about a few extra degrees? But the truth, of course, is hardly that simple.
Climate experts also thought agriculture might benefit from global warming because plants would have access to additional CO2, a primary fuel for their growth. However, these scientists have now found that erratic and extreme weather caused by warming counteracts any gains. I and many other farmers are nodding our heads in agreement.
Just over the past two or three seasons we have had floods, droughts, extreme winds, crazy snow and ice, new and terrible diseases, and a host of other plagues, it seems. It used to be said that if you didn’t like the weather in New England, you just had to wait a moment and it would change. Last summer we had a month without a drop of rain and already this spring we had ten straight days with no sun. It seems that these days the weather is no less variable, but we are waiting longer for it to change.
Of course, our weather problems—annoying and damaging though they be—are mild compared with the floods, droughts, tornadoes, and hurricanes (and earthquakes, which are not connected to global warming) going on elsewhere in the country and the world. No matter how bad it gets around here, someone else somewhere has it ten times worse.
And that is worrisome for farmers and people who eat food wherever they are. A passage from the Times article posed the challenge we collectively face in these blunt terms:
"… in coming decades, farmers need to withstand whatever climate shocks come their way while roughly doubling the amount of food they produce to meet rising demand. And they need to do it while reducing the considerable environmental damage caused by the business of agriculture."
But despite the dread that rises in me when I read these words, I take heart that my small farm may hold some keys to solving this problem on a local, national and even global scale. Climate shocks notwithstanding, we’re already doing our part on these issues.
We produce far more food per acre on our farm than the monocultures surrounding us. We produce an array of diverse crops on a small piece of land, and while we may not be harvesting record-breaking yields for particular crops, we are producing them without doing lasting harm to the land or the surrounding environment. What we grow is consumed fresh by people living in our community, not shipped halfway around the world or processed into Doritos.
When I think about the challenges facing agriculture I am proud of what we do here at The Kitchen Garden. And I believe that if farms around the world start getting smaller, more diverse and more rooted in their communities, we’ll all have an easier time riding out the storm.